Half-Life 2: Episode 1

|
Min
|
Max
|
Ave
|
| MSI
NX7950GX2 |
33
|
91
|
69.08
|
| ASUS
X1900XTX |
41
|
119
|
85.37
|
In this game, the X1900XTX has a clear advantage
in framerates. It did not dip under 40fps and peaked almost 30fps
more than the 7950GX2. During the course of another review, I
did not see this gap with other X1900 hardware, but the results
were reproducible here. While the MSI NX7950GX2 provided a good
gaming experience, the game did feel smoother on the ASUS card.
Image Quality
I never really paid much attention to HDR until
I started playing Episode 1. It really does a lot to immerse a
player into the game, plus it looks fantastic. The ep1_c17_02a
map in particular looks really good, especially with the sunlight
breaking through the walls and ceiling.
Madden 2006

|
Min
|
Max
|
Ave
|
| MSI
NX7950GX2 |
29
|
63
|
57.29
|
| ASUS
X1900XTX |
33
|
63
|
58.35
|
Madden 2006 pretty much provides no challenge to
the hardware. The dips in framerates occurred during stoppages
in play, but the game itself ran very smooth.
Image Quality
The game itself isn't very challenging graphically,
so feel free to bump up the image quality. We maxed out every
detail for this game and stayed pretty consistent near 60fps.
Quake 4

|
Min
|
Max
|
Ave
|
| MSI
NX7950GX2 |
44
|
63
|
59.63
|
| ASUS
X1900XTX |
7
|
63
|
48.63
|
In contrast to Half-Life 2, Quake 4 clearly favoured
the MSI NX7950GX2. Both cards were used in the Core2 level, and
the 7950GX2 hardly suffered any dropped frames. The X1900XTX performed
well, but did slow down a little when the boss spawned little
helpers to fight the battle.
Image Quality
 |
 |
|
MSI 7950GX2
|
ASUS X1900XTX
|
There isn't a big difference between the hardware
platforms, even upon closer examination. I do find the AntiAliasing
a little smoother and less washed out on the 7950GX2 than on
the X1900XTX, despite both using the same AA level.
NEXT