
Introduction
The humble mouse mat design has progressed
over the years to try and provide users with the optimum mousing
surface. Problem is that not everyone wants the same thing, some
like fast moving and friction free pads. Others like pads that
will grip the mouse feet well and so slow down the mouse movement.
Some like to have strange and fetching designs emblazoned all
over, and conversely some like there mouse pads to be free of
graphical distractions. Luckily there are plenty of pads to choose
from, from the lowly generic cloth pad costing you some spare
change, to weird and wonderful pads made from foam or rubber or
aluminium or even glass. OCz
Technology have taken a detour in the Ram R&D and decided
to try and get into the mouse pad market with there own design.
Dubbed the SlickPad, it's what we have here in the labs today.
A
Closer Look


Looking at the pictures you can easily see that it's blue and
with the exception of the OCz Logo in the top left corner is unadulterated
with other imagery or different shades. This is something I personally
like to see from a mouse pad, no graphical distractions. The shape
of the pad is quite common with 'performance' mouse surfaces and
curves nicely to allow for good wrist movement.

The pad works out to be 11mm high with the feet of the pad taking
3mm of this height, which is nice in that you are not angling
your wrist upwards in an awkward position to much; the lower the
better. I did find the edges of the pad to be quite rough, and
whilst they are obviously smoothed out the nature of the pad being
some form of aerated plastic produces a lite sandpaper effect.
The overall size is decent enough though I would have liked to
have had a bit more room across the width. Overall the pad is
big, blue and plastic, though that is not to say it's a bad thing,
just that there's not much to say :)
In
Use
This is a very subjective part of the review but hopefully I'll
be able to include enough information to help you make your own
minds up. To test the pad I've been using it in both every day
normal tasks such as web browsing or just clicking icons etc,
as well as an intense few days of non-stop gaming (woe is me).
Games of choice have ranged from GTA III to Quake III Arena (Capturestrike
CTF and CPMA Duel) to Medal of Honor (specifically the bombed
out town full of snipers level). What I've been looking for here
is to see the difference in the feel of accuracy both from my
own sensory feedback as well as how I felt it affected my gaming.
Weapons of Choice here have been the Intellimouse Explorer V3.0
and the Rotokiller RT-220 rotary ball mouse. In comparison I've
used a cheap laminated mat (urgh) and the desktop surface itself.
The precision was determined in the following ways:


1) Sniping in Medal of Honor
2) Rocket Jumping in Quake III Arena
3) Pixel by Pixel drawing in Photoshop
4) Moving the mouse from lower left of screen to close a window
Anyone
who has read any of my other mouse reviews will know I dislike
cloth mouse pads, even those that are laminated. I find the size
restricting and the surfaces drags too much for my liking. They
do grip the desktop nicely but that is about the only good thing
I can say about them. Also depending on the design the graphical
overlay can sometimes be counter-productive to getting a good
track with optical mice.
The
desktop has none of the above problems, being spacious and with
a bit of polish, slick as well. However it doesn't fare so well
with ball mice in that most often they cannot get a decent grip
on the surface and you find the tracking stuttery at best.
The
OCz SlickPad whilst reducing the real estate afforded by the desktop
doesn't hinder the tracking of either ball mice or optical mice
in anyway. I would have to say this is what I would call a 'slow'
pad in that whilst the surface is quite free flowing it doesn't
give you a feeling of frictionless effort. I know that some folks
will prefer this but I wouldn't be one of them. Perhaps the name
SlickPad is a bit misleading in this respect. Gaming found me
having to put more effort and concentration into sniper style
shots and often found myself correcting my aim rather than snapping
onto a target without thinking about it. Pixel by Pixel drawing
was actually quite good as the slow nature of the surface meant
that with something as precise as this kind of work, I had to
concentrate more which obviously was conducive to making less
mistakes. I'm kind of torn over this pad. I can see how some folks
would like its gripping and 'slow' nature, but not being one of
those kinds, and prefering a frictionless and effortless surface
.
I did find it kind of nice to use for everyday tasks but gaming
wise I've seen better.

Final
Words
OCz
have tried to branch out here and create a 'performance' mouse
pad that would appeal to gamers in particular but in my opinion
there are better pads out there. Whilst there was nothing particularly
wrong with the pad, I found it basic and the SlickPad monicker
to be misleading. I thought that in comparison with a polished
desktop or a pad like the SteelPad 4S it was too slow for gaming.
I know that for some this is what they will look for in a pad,
being able to make precise stops with practice but maybe I was
just mislead by the name. It isn't slick at all really, especially
when compared with other pads on the market. This kind of surface
is good in something like a graphics program that requires slow
precision, which the SlickPad handles admirably. Overall size
was good but it would have been good to see a bit more width to
go with the nice length (top to bottom) of the pad. The height
was good being only 11mm from the desktop to the surface which
would keep wrist strain at a minimum.
When
all is said and done it really depends on what you're looking
for in a pad, but I would be disappointed to buy this pad for
gaming, since I found it to be a hindrance and often found (to
my in-game detriment) that I had to correct my aiming due to the
slow nature of the pad.
Ed.
Note: To be honest, the Slickpad isn't something you'll be
able to find very easily. There was a limited number of samples
available, and it appears these are more novelty items than anything.
We have decided to share our thoughts anyways, in the event OCZ
has a change of heart, or if somebody happens to have some of
these to sell, at least you won't go in blind.
Pros
Good overall size
Low height
Performs well in precision and slow movement
Cons
Quality of edges could be better
SlickPad name is misleading
Pad is rather slow for gaming
Bottom
Line
If you looking for a pad that is great for everyday tasks and
affords you some extra space then the OCz SlickPad will suit.
But for gamers, the SlickPad is a misnomer.
If you have any comments, be sure to hit us up in our forums.