Corsair is a name that should need no introduction
for regular readers of this site and other enthusiast hangouts.
Long known for making high-speed, quality ram, they have supplied
VL with gigabytes of ram modules which have mostly gained positive
results from within our labs. Rather than sending more ram our
way today, they fired over a new entry into their product line,
their Flash
Voyager USB 2.0 flash drive.
While flash drives are hardly unique in this day
and age, we've wondered what took Corsair so long to release such
a product since it does fall under their "memory umbrella".
Seems Corsair did their homework and wanted to put out a product
that addressed the concerns that flash drive users have voiced
in recent years.
| Features |
|
Plug & Play functionality in Windows® XP, 2000,
ME, Linux 2.4 and later, Mac OS 9, X and later
Drivers on CD for Windows® 98
Lanyard, USB cable and driver CD included
Supports sustained read spead of 19MB/sec
Supports sustained write speed of 13MB/sec
Ten year warranty
|
Corsair Flash Voyager

Corsair packages the Flash Voyager in a clear
plastic shell which clearly displays the drive itself and capacity
to thwart those scheming remarkers. Along with the Flash Voyager,
there is a lanyard (a wrist or neck strap), a 27" USB 2.0
extention cable and a mini driver CD for Windows 98 driver installation.

On first inspection, the Flash Voyager differs
from previous flash drives we have reviewed. For one thing, the
drive we received is tiny, measuring about 3" x 0.75"
x 0.5" (as far as we know, all capacities 512MB and less
should be the same size). Rather than a plastic shell, the drive
is covered by a black and blue rubber shell. While the shell is
quite solid, there is a bit of give in the rubber material to
soften any bumps the drive may go through during its lifetime.
The company's URL, logo and the drive's brand name are all embossed
on the drive itself, giving it a bit of a non-slip grip. The aesthetics
are subjective, as I always preferred sleeker, metal looking drives,
but if you like something different, the Flash Voyager certainly
meets that criteria.

Both the cap and lanyard loop are made of the
same rubber as the drive itself. We had some concerns about the
lanyard loop on the drive being insecure given the material used.
As with the cap, the loop is fairly flexible but after some tugging
and pulling with the lanyard in place, the loop never tore.

Between the product logo and the lanyard loop
is a small blue LED which lights up during operation. I was not
able to get a clear image, but the drive's capacity is embossed
on the LED as well, and in this case, 512MB.
Test
Setup
MSI 915P: Intel Pentium 4 560, 2GB Corsair DDR2, 1 x Seagate
160GB, MSI X800XT, MSI 16X DL, Koolance PC3-720SL.
We'll be using real-world benchmarks, copying a variety of media
files (PDF, JPEG and AVI files) from our test rig to the Corsair
Flash Voyager and back. The uncompressed
files weigh in at 242MB (56 files) and will be used for our small
file tests. We'll be copying the same contents, compressed at
227MB (one file) for our large file tests.
We'll be testing both read and write performance where read tests
will be the time needed to copy the contents from the Flash Voyager
to our SATA Seagate drive which is connected to a SATA interface
on the K8T Neo. Write tests will be the time needed to copy the
contents from the SATA to the Flash Voyager. We will be using
the rear USB port on the MSI 915P that is part of the mobo's rear
I/O back panel.
To compare performance, we'll be testing the Flash Voyager directly
against a Mushkin Flashkin USB 2.0 and JetFlash 2A, both of which
are 256MB.
Small Files
|
Read (Time in Minutes,
Seconds)
|
Write (Time in Minutes,
Seconds)
|
| Flash Voyager |
0:48
|
0:58
|
| JetFlash 2A |
0:48
|
0:59
|
| Flashkin 2.0 |
0:52
|
1:01
|
Large File
|
Read (Time in Minutes,
Seconds)
|
Write (Time in Minutes,
Seconds)
|
| Flash Voyager |
0:46
|
0:55
|
| JetFlash 2A |
0:46
|
0:55
|
| Flashkin 2.0 |
0:46
|
0:57
|
All the drives perform within seconds of one another. It's pretty
much a draw, as neither drive has a distinct edge over the other.
Based on our numbers, the Flash Voyager's performance is about
5.04MB/sec and 4.71MB/sec read/write for our small files test,
and 4.93MB/sec and 4.12MB/sec in our large file test. This falls
way short of Corsair's claims of up to 19MB/sec, but those numbers
are of course under ideal circumstances. Nonetheless, we grabbed
ATI's standard 5.1 CATALYST Control Center drivers (about 28MB)
and it took about 3 seconds to copy them to the device. This puts
the Flash Voyager at about 9MB/sec. Results were similar with
the other two devices, as none of these drives were able to meet
their ideal speeds according to specifications.
We did not bother to do thorough USB 1.1 comparisons, but for
the record, our 256MB Crucial Gizmo took almost 4 minutes to complete
the same write tests.
Final Words
Something we haven't done in awhile with flash
drives is run it through a thorough durability check. We've done
things like drop them onto ceramic tiles from 6 feet and dropped
them into a sink of water and removing it quickly (the Flash Voyager
passed both these tests by the way), but we went the extra mile
this time around by throwing it into the washing machine, and
running it through a dry cycle in my Whirlpool appliances. I should
point out that this was unplanned and purely accidental. I happened
to only discover this inadvertant test while folding my laundry
and cursed at my blunder as I had some work saved to this disk
that I had not yet transfered to my PC. Imagine my relief when
I found that my data survived, intact, when I plugged it into
the computer. Considering that my standard wash cycle is 34 minutes,
and my dry cycle at high heat is 43 minutes, it's safe to say
that the Flash Voyager is one tough mutha.
Outside of the durability, speed is of course
another important area for most of you and the Corsair Flash Voyager
does not dissapoint. It was pretty much neck-and-neck with our
Transcend and Mushkin drives and it blew away our Crucial USB
1.1 drive (as did the others). The USB 2.0 to USB 1.1 is no surprise,
and while it didn't cleanly beat the other two, we were satisfied
that it performed within our expectations for an USB 2.0 device.
The only issue we had with the Flash Voyager is
although the rubber shell allows for better protection, it is
one heck of a dust magnet. This is a minor nitpick, but it's quite
embarrassing to pull out the drive from my pocket with pocket
lint all over it. The dust does not really rub off all that easily
either, and the only way to effectively clean it is to use masking
tape and plucking the dust off with it.
The dust problem is really no big deal though,
and the Flash Voyager is a worthy entry into the flash drive market.
Pricing is quite competitive as well, so unless the colours aren't
your bag, we see no reason why not to give it our full recommendation.

Pros: Fast, and durable as hell.
Competively priced and backed by a good warranty.
Cons: Dust magnet.
Bottom Line: We were very pleased
with the Flash Voyager's speed and more importantly, the durabilty.
It survived a free fall onto tiles, a swim in a sink, and a full
laundry cycle without missing a beat. The 10 year warranty is
great, but unless you stick this into your Thanksgiving turkey
and cook it, I doubt you'll ever need to give Corsair's support
a call.
If
you have Questions or Comments on this or any other review, feel
free to use our Forums.
HOME