|
Test
System
ABIT
AI7 motherboard, 1GB Kingston HyperX PC4300, Intel P4 (Prescott
Core) 2.8GHz, ATI Radeon 9600XT 128MB, Hitachi 80GB 7200rpm SATA,
Windows XP SP1a
For
testing purposes I am using NeroCDSpeed from Nero 6.3.1.10, this
should give us a good indication of how the drive performs in various
situations and on differing media types.
Comparison
Drives
I will
be comparing the AOpen DRW8800 (8x DVD +/- R, 4x DVD +/- RW, 32x
CD-R, 16x CD-RW) to the previously reviewed ASUS DRW-0804P (8x DVD
+/-R, 4x DVD +/- RW, 24x CD-R, 24x CD-RW) and the Pioneer DVR-105
(4x DVD –R, 2.4x DVD-RW, 16x CD-R, 8x CD-RW).
Read
Tests
First
off we will try some DVD reading, starting with reading a pressed
DVD Video and then a pressed DVD Data Disk (the one that came with
the drive actually).
|
|
Video
|
Data
|
|
AOpen
|
3.41
|
8.9
|
|
ASUS
|
3.92
|
9.37
|
|
Pioneer
|
2.06
|
9.46
|
Nero
Drive Speed scores, Higher is better
As
you can see, the AOpen is slightly slower than the Pioneer and the
ASUS on a pressed DVD Data Disc; however, it performs better than
the Pioneer and up to par with the ASUS when reading a Dual Layer
DVD Video Disc.
Next
we will compare the read speeds of pressed CDs, CD-R.
|
|
CD
|
CD-R
|
|
AOpen
|
31.62
|
31.36
|
|
ASUS
|
30.28
|
31.87
|
|
Pioneer
|
25.56
|
25.6
|
Nero
Drive Speed scores, Higher is better
AOpen
keeps up nicely with the ASUS, both of which outperform the dated
Pioneer when reading pressed and written CDs.
Write
Tests
Now
for what you buy this drive for, writing DVDs. Here we will look
at DVD + and -R speeds using TDK 8x +R and Ritek 8x -R Media.
|
|
+R
|
-R
|
|
AOpen
|
09:18
|
09:20
|
|
ASUS
|
07:50
|
08:03
|
|
Pioneer
|
N/A
|
14:14
|
Time
in Minutes, Lower is better
Some
very interesting results here. The ASUS outperforms the AOpen handily
in this category, with the AOpen taking almost 1:30 longer to burn
4.14GB on a +R disc, and 1:15 longer on a -R disc. The Pioneer,
a 4x recorder, is an obvious distant 3rd. The write speeds were
similar whether we were writing a Data DVD or Video from an ISO.
Next
we will compare +/- RW disks, unfortunately, the previous review
of RW discs on the ASUS did not include the -RW. Fortunately, the
-RW speeds are almost identical to the +RW speeds on the AOpen,
so we assume the same will happen on the ASUS. We used Memorex 4x
+RW and Ritek 4x -RW for this test.
|
|
+RW
|
-RW
|
|
AOpen
|
14:04
|
13.51
|
|
ASUS
|
13:47
|
N/A
|
|
Pioneer
|
N/A
|
27:52
|
Time
in Minutes, Lower is better
Once
again the AOpen is outperformed by the ASUS, although in this instance
it is not as drastic a difference, a mere 0:17 seconds variance
on the +RW disc. As with the +/- R disc, the write speeds are identical
with Video or Data being written to the disc.
Last
up is CD writing speeds, this section is a little grayer as each
drive has different writing speeds on the CD side, I tend to believe
that a mechanical device has so many burns (right or wrong), therefore
I tend to burn CDs on my dedicated MSI 32x burner. Never the less,
we need to show you the performance in case this is the only writer
you will have installed. We used FujiFilm 40x CD-R and Memorex 24x
CD-RW for this test.
|
|
CD-R
|
CD-RW
|
|
AOpen
|
27.68
|
16.04
|
|
ASUS
|
22.45
|
22.35
|
|
Pioneer
|
16.02
|
8.01
|
Nero
Drive Speed scores, Higher is better
The
AOpen performs very well in the CD-R tests, and up to par in the
CD-RW tests. With the ASUS and Pioneer coming in at 24x and 16x
respectively, it would be difficult to compare them to the 32x of
the AOpen. Interestingly, the ASUS is a 24x CD-RW burner while the
AOpen is a 16x CD-RW.
Additional
Notes
I attempted
to write several other media (non 8x) to determine write speeds
and if there would be any problematic media to look out for. I used
Alcohol 120% with a Video ISO of 4.14GB, here is a sample of what
I found.
|
Media
|
Rated
Speed
|
Max
Write Speed
|
|
TDK
120Min Video 4x +R
|
4x
|
6.1x
|
|
Kyphermedia
4x Data +R
|
4x
|
4.3x
|
|
FujiFilm
120Min Video 2.4x +R
|
2.4x
|
2.6x
|
|
Memorex
120Min Video 2.4x +R
|
2.4x
|
2.8x
|
|
Samsung
120Min Video 2.4x –R
|
2.4x
|
2.4x
|
|
Kyphermedia
Data 4x –R
|
4x
|
2.4x
|
Conclusion
AOpen
has delivered an adequate drive for those of us who require +/-
support, and at a very nice price point of $75
USD. Although the drive is not as fast as the ASUS, it is a
suitable drive for those of us who don't burn DVDs 24x7 as the MIAA
thinks we all do. The included software gives the beginner a great
place to start and build their own DVDs from many sources, primarily
your MiniDV camcorder, with tools to help you become a Director/Producer
in your own right.
It's
a shame that AOpen didn't include any blank media to get you started
although this probably goes towards keeping the overall cost to
a minimum, although you would think that users would prefer a less
'flashy' box in favour of some blank media.
Apart
from that, and despite the fact their seems to be a lot of 'cons'
mentioned, for the money this is a good unit, although not as fast
as others on the market.
Pros:
Burns 8x + and -R DVD media, 4x + and -RW DVD media, and 32x CD-R
media. Windows XP recognizes with no intervention. Quality included
Software (for the most part). Price.
Cons:
Midrange speeds on writing DVDs. Nero 5.5 instead of 6.x. No included
8x DVD + or - media.
Bottom
Line: AOpen has delivered a cost effective +/- writer with
decent speeds and a good package of included software. AOpen should
consider changing some of their verbiage, especially the Dual,
as I am sure some people will assume Dual Layer, and they would
be very disappointed.
HOME
|