Testing
| CPU |
Intel
C2D Q6600 |
| Motherboard |
Gigabyte
X48 |
| Memory |
2
x 1024 Corsair 1066 |
| Hard
Drive |
Seagate
Cuda 7200.9 |
| OS |
Vista
Ultimate 32-bit |
Comparison video card will be MSI's GeForce 8800 GT. The Gigabyte
is clocked faster in a couple areas, but the MSI card is clocked
faster in the memory department. From an AMD standpoint, we'll
be using the Sapphire Radeon 3850
Software used in the tests will be:
3dMark06
Company of Heroes
Crysis
Half-Life 2: Episode 2
Call of Duty 4
All tests were performed 3 times, using the default control panel
settings of ForceWare Release 169 and ATI's Catalyst 8.4.
3dMark06 (NoAA/AF) - 1920x1200

Despite the higher GPU and shader clock, the Gigabyte
GeForce 8800 GT Turbo Force Edition did not sweep through the
3dMark06 tests. It led the overall score and SM3 score, but fell
short of the MSI in SM2.
Company of Heroes (No AA/4xAA @ 8xAF) - 1920x1200,
DX9

The greatest RTS game ever (sorry, I had to throw
that in) runs very well with all three cards. The Sapphire lags
behind the pack, but the actual gameplay experience was more or
less the same. None of the cards lagged at all, even in the more
intense shootouts.
Crysis (No AA/AF) - 1920x1200

Crysis chews up a lot of memory and GPU horsepower
and the higher clocked Gigabyte flexes its muscle here. If scrapes
ahead of the MSI and trounces the Sapphire.
Half-Life 2 (4xAA/HDR) - 1920x1200

Another close one between the two 8800 GT cards.
NEXT